

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="-286">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Perilaku Ekonomi Aktor Politik Dalam Proses Voting</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Joesoef, Rizal Jose</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text"></placeTerm>
  </place>
  <publisher> Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen</publisher>
  <dateIssued></dateIssued>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code">ind</languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text">Indonesia</languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Index Artikel</form>
  <extent>Sumber artikel:Jurnal. Halaman: p.127-138</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>The foundation of a democratic goverment is that it respects the will of people as expressed through the ballot box. Unfortunetely  these lofty ideals are not so easily implemented. Strategic interactions arise in voting  just as in other multiperson game. Neither majority rule nor any other voting scheme can solve these problem  for there does not exist any one perfect system for aggregating up individuals   preferences into a will of the people. This deep result is due to Kenneth J. Arrow. His theorem demonstrated logically that any system for aggregatting unrestricticted preferences over three or more alternnatives into a group decision cannot simultaneously satisfy the following minimally properties  (1) collective rationality  (2) unrestricted domain  (3) pareto principle  (4) Independence of irrelevant alternatives  and (5) non-dictatorship. This study is about strategic voting. How should people behave in voting procces  my answer does not deal with ethich or etiqutte. Nor do I aim to compete with philosophers or preachers. My theme  although less lofty  affects the lives of all of us just as much as do morality and manners. All of us may be strategiests  wheter we like it or not.</note>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>POLITIK (VOTING)</topic>
 </subject>
 <classification>330.05 JUR</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>UPT Perpustakaan UM Koleksi Bahan Pustaka Perpustakaan UM</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator>2</shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals>
  <slims:digital_item id="" url="" path="/" mimetype=""></slims:digital_item>
 </slims:digitals>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>-286</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001-10-11 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001-10-11 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>