

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="-43101">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Analisis Interprestasi Elit Pendidikan Indonesia tentang Ideologi Pendidikan Nasional</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Karti Soeharto</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text"></placeTerm>
  </place>
  <publisher>Bag.serial Jurnal Pendidikan &amp; pembelajaran Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Universitas Negeri Malang</publisher>
  <dateIssued></dateIssued>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code">ind</languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text">Indonesia</languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Index Artikel</form>
  <extent>Sumber artikel:Jurnal. Halaman: 68 - 81</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>This articel focuses on the interpretation of Indonesian education elites on the education ideology represented in the politics of education which takes the form of National education System Bill Number 20 Year 2003. It is based on a research which concerned a couple of question  1) how did Indonesian education elites interpret the foundation  curriculum and management of national education  2) is Indonesian ideology of education categorized in O  Neill  s education ideology theory  and why  The research used two main theories  (1) O  Neill  education ideology theory  dialectic theory  and (2) Putnam theory on elite identification. There were ten informants in the researcg  and the data collected was in the form of statue document and interview transcript. Individual analysis unit used human instrument. The data were analyzed using Strauss and Corbin model. The research resulted in two main findings. First  based on the interpretation of Indonesian educational elites  the foundation  curriculum and management of national education were considered to have the characteristics of both social conservative ideology and liberal ideology. Second  based on the strategic interpretation and positional cluster of Indonesian educational elites  Indonesian educational ideology could be categorized into conservative ideology  while based on the non strategic interpretation and reputation cluster  the ideology could be included in compromistic liberal ideology</note>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>1. POLITIK PENDIDIKAN&#13;2. ELITE PENDIDIKAN&#13;3. IDEOLOGI PENDIDIKAN</topic>
 </subject>
 <classification>371.105 JUR 201</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>UPT Perpustakaan UM Koleksi Bahan Pustaka Perpustakaan UM</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator>2</shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals>
  <slims:digital_item id="" url="" path="/" mimetype=""></slims:digital_item>
 </slims:digitals>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>-43101</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-06-14 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-06-14 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>