

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="-44992">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Prakiraan cuaca dengan metoda autoregressive integrated moveing average, nehral network, dan adaptive splines threshold autoregression di stasiun juanda surabaya.</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Sutikno</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text"></placeTerm>
  </place>
  <publisher>Bag.serial Jurnal sains dirgantara: journal of aerouspace sciences</publisher>
  <dateIssued></dateIssued>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code">ind</languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text">Indonesia</languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Index Artikel</form>
  <extent>Sumber artikel:Jurnal. Halaman: 43 - 61</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>The need of weather forecasting is primary to support activities in various sectors  so the effors of development for forecest methods to improve the precision and the accuracy of the weather information are very important. various weather forecasting models by engineering or stochastic model approach have been developed  although each method has both weaknesses and strengths  the efforts for developing techniques or methods to get the best model haue to be done. What is elaborated in this article represent the result of testing in three statistical methods to obtain the best weather foresesting models.three methods as mentioned before are the Autoregressive integrate moving average (ARIMA)  Neural Network (NN)  and Adiptif Splines Threshold Autoregression (ASTAR) to forescast the temperatur humudity  and daily rainfall.The performance of these three methods s are evaluated by corelation values and root mean Square Errir(RMSE). The good performance characterized by a high corelation between actual and fprecastt valuest  and also has a small RMSE. The results of this research indicate that ASTAR method produces better signet by a higher correlation lower RMSE values and the constant forecasting from the first day until the thirtieth. The corelation in ASTAR method for Tmax and RHmin respectivelyare 0.70 and 0 75 for ARIMA method are 0.12 and 0.47  for NN method are 0.02 and -0.06. The three methods have poor performance for Tmin  RHmax and RRR.   </note>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>Weather forecast ARIMA ASTAR,Neural Network</topic>
 </subject>
 <classification>629.13 JUR 1;2</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>UPT Perpustakaan UM Koleksi Bahan Pustaka Perpustakaan UM</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator>2</shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals>
  <slims:digital_item id="" url="" path="/" mimetype=""></slims:digital_item>
 </slims:digitals>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>-44992</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-12-12 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012-12-12 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>