

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="-93170">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Supervisors&amp;rsquo; Written Feedback and Students&amp;rsquo; Responses Towards Feedback on Undergraduate Research Proposals</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Aridah Aridah...[et.al]</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text"></placeTerm>
  </place>
  <publisher>Serial IJEE : Indonesian of Journal English Education UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta</publisher>
  <dateIssued></dateIssued>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code">ind</languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text">Indonesia</languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Index Artikel</form>
  <extent>Sumber artikel:Jurnal. Halaman: 115-132</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>This study explores the types of feedback given by supervisors on undergraduate thesis proposals and investigates how the students respond to the feedback. The data were collected from research proposal pages containing feedback and interview transcripts through a mixed method with a case study design. Four supervised students of the English Department at one university in Samarinda  whose graduation was delayed due to incompletion of their theses  participated in this study. The quantitative data covered the total feedback occurrences and were analyzed using frequency and percentage. The qualitative data were taken from the interview transcript and were analyzed using a coding scheme based on feedback typologies by Ellis (2009)  C aacute rcamo (2020)  and Pearson (2022). The findings revealed that from a number of feedback types expected in this study  only 8 were identified  with implicit feedback being the most common. The students perceived supervisors   feedback as helpful and useful for revising their proposals  but they preferred explicit feedback because of its direct error corrections. Some supervisors   comments were unclear  making it difficult for the students to understand and do revisions. Yet  they hesitated to communicate with their supervisors because they were afraid and concerned about politeness. The study highlights the importance of aligning supervisor feedback practices with students   expectations and emphasizes the need for effective communication and good relationships to prevent delays in thesis completion.</note>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>1. BAHASA INGGRIS - BIMBINGAN TUGAS AKHIR&#13;2. ENGLISH LANGUAGE - THESIS GUIDANCE</topic>
 </subject>
 <classification>428 IJE</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>UPT Perpustakaan UM Koleksi Bahan Pustaka Perpustakaan UM</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator>2</shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals>
  <slims:digital_item id="" url="" path="/" mimetype=""></slims:digital_item>
 </slims:digitals>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>-93170</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-07-30 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-07-30 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>