

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="-94413">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Teacher Perspective:</title>
  <subTitle>Implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning Model</subTitle>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Rizki Nurjehan; Khairil Ansari; Yusnadi</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text"></placeTerm>
  </place>
  <publisher>Serial JTP : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan</publisher>
  <dateIssued></dateIssued>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code">ind</languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text">Indonesia</languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Index Artikel</form>
  <extent>Sumber artikel:Jurnal. Halaman: 260-9</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Keywords    Perspectives  Teachers  Models  Contextual Teaching and Learning   Abstract  Research on Teacher Perspectives in the implementation of the Contextual Teaching and Learning model aims to analyze teachers   views on the implementation of the Contextual Teaching and Learning model. This research analyzes the difficulties  obstacles  advantages and disadvantages during the process of implementing the Contextual Teaching and Learning model. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method using observation sheets and questionnaires to collect the required information data and process it into the findings described. The findings obtained from the research are that there are obstacles to implementing the Contextual Teaching and Learning model at the Learning Community stage of 50% compared to the level of difficulty at other stages such as constructivism 20%  inquiry 10%  questioning 5%  modeling 5%  reflection 5% and authentic assessment 5%. Furthermore  it can be seen that the lowest level of implementation was in the Learning Community component  with 55 people answering that it was not implemented. Furthermore  in other components  namely constructivism  inquiry  questionnaire  modeling  reflection and authentic assessment  it was seen that an average of 15 to 20 people answered that it had not been implemented. So the research results conclude that there are obstacles to the implementation of the Learning Community stages in the Contextual Teaching and Learning model. The difficulty of implementing the Learning Community stages by teaching staff.     </note>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>1. MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL&#13;2. PERSPEKTIF GURU</topic>
 </subject>
 <classification>371.33 JTP</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>UPT Perpustakaan UM Koleksi Bahan Pustaka Perpustakaan UM</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator>2</shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals>
  <slims:digital_item id="" url="" path="/" mimetype=""></slims:digital_item>
 </slims:digitals>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>-94413</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-11-11 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-11-11 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>