

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="-94613">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Kritik terhadap Filsafat Pendidikan Jacques Ranci&amp;egrave;reCriticisms against Jacques Ranci&amp;egrave;re's Philosophy of Education</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Clemens Dion Yusila Timur</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text"></placeTerm>
  </place>
  <publisher>Serial Diskursus : Jurnal filsafat dan teologi</publisher>
  <dateIssued></dateIssued>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code">ind</languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text">Indonesia</languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Index Artikel</form>
  <extent>Sumber artikel:Jurnal. Halaman: 56-96</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Keywords    Ranci egrave re  education  equality of intelligence  presupposition  emancipation          Abstract  This article contains four criticisms against Jacques Ranci egrave re  s philosophy of education  insofar as his philosophy is written in his work The Ignorant Schoolmaster. In the first criticism  Ranci egrave re  s presupposition of equality of intelligence would be framed as a truth claim and to the extent that it can be treated as such  Ranci egrave re  s argument contains a number of defects. The second criticism underscores the distinction between inequality of intelligence and inequality of knowledge Ranci egrave re confuses. The third criticism concerns the contradiction between what Ranci egrave re has written and what he practiced and also the weakness of the defense provided by his supporters on this point. Fourth  Ranci egrave re  s redefinition of  ldquo emancipation rdquo  as verification of the equality of intelligence turns out to strip away the very idea of emancipation of what makes it meaningful for many people.  Abstrak  Tulisan ini berisi empat kritik terhadap filsafat pendidikan Jacques Ranci egrave re sebagaimana tertuang dalam karyanya The Ignorant Schoolmaster. Dalam kritik pertama  pengandaian kesetaraan akal budi Ranci egrave re akan dikemas sebagai klaim kebenaran dan sejauh itu dapat diperlakukan sebagai klaim kebenaran  argumen Ranci egrave re mengandung sejumlah kecacatan. Kritik kedua menggarisbawahi perbedaan antara ketidaksetaraan akal budi dan ketidaksetaraan pengetahuan yang dirancukan Ranci egrave re. Kritik ketiga berkaitan dengan adanya kontradiksi antara apa yang Ranci egrave re tuliskan dan apa yang ia praktikkan serta kelemahan pendukung Ranci egrave re dalam membela butir ini. Keempat  pendefinisian ulang Ranci egrave re atas  ldquo emansipasi rdquo  sebagai verifikasi atas kesetaraan akal budi justru melucuti ide emansipasi dari apa yang membuatnya bagi banyak orang berarti.            </note>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>1. FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN JACQUES RANCIERE</topic>
 </subject>
 <classification>210.5 DIS</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>UPT Perpustakaan UM Koleksi Bahan Pustaka Perpustakaan UM</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator>2</shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals>
  <slims:digital_item id="" url="" path="/" mimetype=""></slims:digital_item>
 </slims:digitals>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>-94613</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-11-28 00:00:00</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-11-28 00:00:00</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>